Patent Mediation in the Federal Circuit
See Patent Mediation on Your Horizon? by Kevin R. Casey at Stradley Ronon Stevens & Young, LLP, over at Metropolitan Corporate Counsel. Here's an excerpt to wet your appetitie.
In efforts to enhance the success that the mediation program of the Federal Circuit has already enjoyed in its short existence, Chief Circuit Mediator Amend identified at the Conference eight impediments to settlement of patent cases on appeal.
The impediments are:
- the case involves a "troll" (which might be defined as a non-inventive entity with no commercial product that acquires and asserts overbroad patents in an attempt to extort a toll from others) and the defendant company wishes to avoid a "bulls-eye" inviting further litigation;
- party representatives with settlement authority are not present for the mediation session;
- the party having lost the judgment appealed is reluctant to mediate (although perhaps counterintuitive, because the winning party might seem more reluctant, the cost of rolling the die on appeal may appear small relative to the cost already sunk into the case);
- the patent was held invalid (one solution might be to ask the district court to vacate its invalidity holding as part of a settlement award);
- counsel is representing the appellant on a contingent fee basis;
- an emotional, entrepreneur patent owner appeals a loss and seeks "justice";
- a summary judgment of non-infringement is appealed and the plaintiff seeks millions (the "lottery" case); and
- a party believes it is entitled to attorney fees or enhanced damages. The court is in the process of refining the selection criteria for, and the techniques used in, its mediation program to take these impediments into account and improve the program.
Let me just say this -- justice -- is not an impediment to a successful mediation, it is a means of insuring a successful mediation.
