Mediator's Proposal: Take It or Leave It by Robert J. Rose of Sheldon Mak
by Robert J. Rose * of Sheldon Mak Rose & Anderson
Both sides seem to be progressing to resolution, but have hit a wall. Is it time for the mediator to make a proposal for settlement? If so, should the mediator use the value that the case is worth (which one side or the other likely won’t accept), or the value that the mediator thinks will settle the case?
The typical “mediator’s proposal” is given to both sides as a take-it-or-leave-it proposition to resolve the case. Each party can confidentially accept or reject the proposal without compromising their negotiating position. The problem is that the mediator knows who accepted, and who didn’t, and it usually means the exit of the mediator from the matter. In other words, the mediator only gets one bite at the apple.
The technique can have dramatic results. A reluctant plaintiff will make a large jump if the money is really “on the table.” Defendants will come up with money they otherwise deny having, if it means that the case is really over. It also eliminates reactive devaluation.
Generally, the mediator should choose a number that both sides could agree to, rather than a number that the mediator thinks they should agree to. If the parties think that the mediator might make an evaluative proposal, they will approach the mediation like a mini arbitration right from the start.
The mediator should not discuss a proposal until the parties ask for it, or at least until the mediation seems to be over. It is best to set a cut-off time for a simple “yes” or “no” response, allow no negotiating with the mediator about the proposal, and unless there is a deal, don’t end the time period early. Someone could change their mind at the eleventh hour.
____________________
* Robert J. Rose is a registered patent attorney and practices patent prosecution and patent, copyright, trademark and antitrust litigation. Currently serving as Sheldon Mak's Managing Director, Mr. Rose has written, lectured and testified extensively as an expert in the areas of patents and antitrust.
Mr. Rose has authored patent litigation opinions in the fields of image compression, digital imaging, printer ink cartridges, industrial control of high-speed food processing machines, industrial lighting, geometric optics and remote control devices. He has been chair of the Board of Advisors to the Physics Department of the University of Arizona since 2000. He is also a member of the Dean’s Board of Advisors for the College of Science at the UA. He is also Adjunct Professor of Law at the University of La Verne College of Law in intellectual property. He was also awarded the UA Alumni Association Professional Achievement Award in 2004, nominated by the College of Science. Mr. Rose was recently profiled in the American Physical Society newsletter, APS News, click here. Rose is Chambers rated.
Previously employed as Senior Litigation & Antitrust Counsel and Assistant Secretary of Twentieth Century Fox Film Corporation, he has valuable insight into the needs and problems of in-house counsel.
